The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust (which also seems to employ most of the RSC’s FOH team!) has announced a Shakespeare Hall of Fame for the Birthday celebrations in April. Twelve names are in, with the thirteenth to be chosen from the poll here. Current inductees are (in chronological order): Ben Jonson, David Garrick, Charles Dickens, Ellen Terry, Laurence Olivier, Judi Dench, Kenneth Branagh, Patrick Stewart, Akira Kurosawa, Sam Wanamaker and Paul Robeson. The candidates for the thirteenth place (a competition which the Guardian poll suggests a certain DTennant will win) are: Peter Brook, John Gielgud, Boris Pasternak, Sarah Siddons, Peggy Ashcroft, George Bernard Shaw, Goethe, Sarah Bernhardt, Virginia Woolf and David Tennant himself.
Predictably, this has enraged me.
Firstly, I think it was bloody stupid putting Tennant on the list for thirteenth place, since he will obviously win – far better to have excluded him completely, or just given him a place among the original twelve. I don’t think it’s exactly justifiable when GIELGUD (let me say that again, GIELGUD) and Peggy Ashcroft (PEGGY ASHCROFT) didn’t make the cut, but if bloody Leonardo di Caprio is up there (for a bad performance in a bad film), presumably on grounds of bringing-new-audience-to-Shakespeare, then David Tennant (who, you know, is a much better actor and encouraged lots of people who’d only come to see HIM in Hamlet to book again, to read another play) should definitely be included. More importantly, if Patrick Stewart is in there, Harriet Walter should be too (this is perhaps a not entirely unexpected conclusion for me to draw. Harriet! Look at her beautiful face).
Secondly, my list would also only stick to theatre practitioners (there could be a separate list for writers & academics), partly because I am biased (Shakespeare wrote plays, not books) and partly because there are just too many good actors and directors. So out with Dickens (why is he even there?) and Woolf, and in with Brook, and either Ashcroft or Gielgud (and why Jonson? Why Jonson?). Given the location of the exhibition (Stratford-on-Avon), the Trust’s failure to include either Michael Boyd or Greg Doran seems, to me, a little misguided. The achievement of both is comparable to that of Wanamaker, arguably – but then, living in Stratford and not Southwark, I would say that. I don’t begrudge Wanamaker his place (unlike bloody di Caprio) but Boyd and Doran deserve as much recognition as he does.
I think it would almost have been better just to put ‘the RSC’ as one of the items, or to make a separate RSC Hall of Fame (Jon Slinger, Alexandra Gilbreath, Anton Lesser, Juliet Stevenson, Alan Rickman, David Suchet, Chuk Iwuji, Clive Wood, Ian Richardson, Donald Sinden, Trevor Nunn – oh my goodness, Trevor Nunn‘s not on there, Fiona Shaw oh my goodness she’s not on there…). I voted for Ashcroft, although Shaw (even if Shaw had never written a line of drama, I’d break my own rules for his rehabilitation of lovely Helena, whom even Ellen Terry hated) or Brook would do.
On a far less infuriating note, have another Shakespeare link; hilarious version of the 25 facts meme that’s been going round Facebook et al: Five And Twenty Random Things Abovt Me. It sounds awful, it’s not. It’s the cure for what ails you, seriously. Also lovely – a post Jenny showed me summarising a medievalist’s reading on ‘how to write love letters in the fourteenth century: The Rules’ – I am like the flower of tamarisk that must remain inviolable. Yet again this afternoon I had a brief burst of why am I not studying Shakespeare more than I already am.
Have also added two blogs to the blogroll (Eat Your Sherbert and The Jenny Times). The former is (awesome, rational) feminism (Katy and I divided feminisms into four sorts on Saturday – radical, woolly, nice and useless) and music reviews, the second is (one of the four) best friend(s) a girl could possibly ask for. My love for her manages to transcend her beauty, intelligence & talent (which is pretty much a pattern with them), which in anybody else would sicken me.
WHAT NO DEREK JACOBI. FAIL OF ALL FAIL.
LikeLike
LOL DEREK.
I think Gielgud and Richardson are greater omissions, to be honest. But yes, Jacobi’s somebody else to be incensed about (as is Maggie Smith, and what about Vanessa Redgrave? Or ANY OF THE CUSACKS?).
LikeLike
JACOBI IS MY RICHARD NOTHING SURPASSES THAT.
(Although I totally agree that they should ditch the writers in favour of the actors, in this instance, which would give room for several who have been GLARINGLY LEFT OUT.)
LikeLike
Are you saying that Woolf’s out so Jacobi can come in from the cold?
Is that what you, of all people, are saying? IS IT.
LikeLike
To be quite frank, I am totally baffled at inclusion of CD and VW in the first place. VW didn’t even start liking Shakespeare until Thoby shoved her in the right direction. I really don’t see how she is in the frame for this one at all.
LikeLike
I agree with EVERYTHING you say here. EVERYTHING. It is mad that Tennant is on the list (and will likely win) when Harriet Walter/Fiona Shaw/tons of other awesome RSC people are not. I am cranky now. A separate RSC Hall of Fame would be a *much* better idea.
(And yay, you did see the Harriet pics I chose! Glad you enjoyed them.)
LikeLike
It would be cool if we could have a picture of Virginia Woolf and Goethe in a fight. (My money’s on Virginia any day.)
Thanks for the add to your most esteemed blogroll! Should we ever sort our technological arse from our elbow, we shall return the courtesy. xxx
LikeLike
Hello my dear! I never did that doughnut, no (*elides media*). I think Dame Peg would win in a celebrity deathmatch of all the reserves, myself. Katy technology is not that hard. xxx
LikeLike
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first
comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep
visiting this blog very often.
Alessandra
http://www.craigslistpostingonline.info
LikeLike